Hi,
as far as I know, that is NOT possible.
You might want to post the code here together with the error so someone could possibly find the error...
Regards,
Andreas.
Search found 201 matches
- 24 Jun 2017 12:50
- Forum: Z-Uno
- Topic: Download current sketch on Z-UNO
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3818
- 24 Jun 2017 12:48
- Forum: Z-Uno
- Topic: Connecting through FTDI cable instead of USB
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5472
Re: Connecting through FTDI cable instead of USB
Hi,
you could still try to upload new sketches with OTA (as described here) and power the device over pin 1 (5 Volt)or over the battery connector / pin 4 (3.3 Volt) directly...
Regards,
Andreas.
you could still try to upload new sketches with OTA (as described here) and power the device over pin 1 (5 Volt)or over the battery connector / pin 4 (3.3 Volt) directly...
Regards,
Andreas.
- 24 Jun 2017 12:42
- Forum: Discussions in English
- Topic: Problem with one device after upgrading to 2.3.0/2.3.1
- Replies: 27
- Views: 24465
Re: Problem with one device after upgrading to 2.3.0/2.3.1
Hi, sorry, I just recognized that I started writing in German... sorry for that. @enbemokel: So the siren really still responds to no-secure messages AFTER security messages stopped working? Then it is definitely a firmware issue of the device! I expect some internal stack-overflow in the handling o...
- 24 Jun 2017 12:36
- Forum: Z-Uno
- Topic: Define ZUNO Channel
- Replies: 16
- Views: 23433
Re: Define ZUNO Channel
Hi, I am not sure if I understood your problem... #define ZUNO_CHANNEL_NUMBER_ONE 1 This just defines the "pseudo constant" ZUNO_CHANNEL_NUMBER_ONE which is to be replaced with the assigned value (1 in this case) by the pre-processor prior to compiling. In the example this is just to use a...
- 22 Jun 2017 22:22
- Forum: Discussions in English
- Topic: Problem with one device after upgrading to 2.3.0/2.3.1
- Replies: 27
- Views: 24465
Re: Problem with one device after upgrading to 2.3.0/2.3.1
Hi Bjoern, es müssen nicht unbedingt alle Klassen mit SECURITY geschützt werden. Soweit ich das gesehen habe ist z.B. "Version" nicht geschützt. Du könntest also mal versuchen damit einen Befehl zu erzeugen. (Keine Ahnung welche Befehle Z-Way da zur Verfügung stellt...) Non-Secure einbinde...
- 19 Jun 2017 22:21
- Forum: Discussions in English
- Topic: Problem with one device after upgrading to 2.3.0/2.3.1
- Replies: 27
- Views: 24465
Re: Problem with one device after upgrading to 2.3.0/2.3.1
Hi, I have to agree with PoltoS. If the device is not reacting and work again after a power-down/power-up cycle, then it is definitely a problem of the device. It "might" be that this wierd behavior is somehow triggered by something that is now different than in the past, but it is still a...
- 05 Jun 2017 15:44
- Forum: Z-Uno
- Topic: Release 2.0.8?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 25191
- 04 Jun 2017 22:18
- Forum: Z-Uno
- Topic: Release 2.0.8?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 25191
Re: Release 2.0.8?
I hope I can implement at least a basic support for S2 in the near future, so I personally don't need S0 any longer. But I wonder how you can support "authenticated" S2 without having a DSK on the Z-UNO? For the moment I am not sure how fast the "other" system will be supporting ...
- 04 Jun 2017 09:21
- Forum: Z-Uno
- Topic: Release 2.0.8?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 25191
Re: Release 2.0.8?
Hi PoltoS, 2.0.10 is on the way. Few cool feature to come in this release. Dynamic configuration of channels from the sckets and an example of a sketch implementing serial AT-like protocol. Also Arduino IDE 1.8.5+ support. Unfortunatelly it was shifted to the end of June. sounds good, support for a ...
- 04 Jun 2017 00:17
- Forum: Z-Uno
- Topic: Release 2.0.8?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 25191
Release 2.0.10/2.0.11 (Re: Release 2.0.8?)
Hi PoltoS, any plans to release 2.0.10 in the near future? According to the roadmap it was planned for May. And what about 2.0.11 and S2 Security? From the list, S2 Security is not planned for 2.0.11. Is that still true? Any rough idea for the time schedule of S2? Z-Wave features: - [2.0.10] User de...