Search found 201 matches
- 23 Sep 2016 00:42
- Forum: Z-Uno
- Topic: Problem with ASSOCIATION
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5906
Re: Problem with ASSOCIATION
Hi PoltoS, I tried several times to exclude and re-programm the Z-Uno with different other sketches and had a lot of very wierd behavior. Sometimes the Z-Uno was included with a wrong type, e.g. I programmed a mulitlevel_switch and a binary_switch was reported. Or I just added two more association g...
- 22 Sep 2016 20:01
- Forum: Z-Uno
- Topic: Problem with ASSOCIATION
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5906
Re: Problem with ASSOCIATION
Hi PoltoS, ich changed the define to "1" but it still not working. And I can confirm that the association still was also there after another exclude/include. I am using the 2.x.x (I hope, at least I changed the definition to: http://z-uno.z-wave.me/files/z-uno/test-ucxx/package_z-wave.me_i...
- 22 Sep 2016 09:22
- Forum: Z-Uno
- Topic: Problem with ASSOCIATION
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5906
Problem with ASSOCIATION
Hi, i am struggling with two problems for ASSOCIATION at the moment. I exetended the simple_switch example to have an association group added and whenever the state is changed i use e.g. zunoSendToGroupSetValueCommand(CONTROL_GROUP_1, 0xff); to get the basic set command send out for that association...
- 20 Sep 2016 08:32
- Forum: Z-Uno
- Topic: enabling ZWave-SECURITY
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8465
Re: enabling ZWave-SECURITY
Hi PoltoS, Unfortunately I don't think we will have time to do that you request. We would like to make basic functions first. I understand that basic functions should go first and fully agrree to that, that is why I stated that this is not an urgent request. I am not planning to use this very soon.....
- 19 Sep 2016 21:47
- Forum: Z-Uno
- Topic: enabling ZWave-SECURITY
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8465
Re: enabling ZWave-SECURITY
Hi PoltoS, by enabling SECURITY for all classes there is no possibility to communicate with other nodes that do not support SECURITY, and there a lot of such devices. This would mean that I have to communicate "through" the automation system by reacting on the secured msg, then sending out...
- 18 Sep 2016 17:46
- Forum: Z-Uno
- Topic: enabling ZWave-SECURITY
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8465
enabling ZWave-SECURITY
Hi, i just enabled SECURITY with the "Simple-Dimmer" example to test the secure inclusion. I realized that there is only a global swith available to enable/disable SECURITY without a possibility to choose what classes should be non-secure / secure. In the current situation (almost) all cla...
- 15 Sep 2016 08:15
- Forum: Z-Uno
- Topic: Sketchupdate via FIRMWARE_UPDATE_MD class?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3361
Sketchupdate via FIRMWARE_UPDATE_MD class?
Hi, I did not found a description of the FIRMWARE_UPDATED_MD class, but I expect that this function will only update the core of the Z-UNO, like the ZWave-Network and application layer as well as the sketch bootloader but not the sketch itself. Is this correct? Is there or will there be a possibilit...
- 10 Sep 2016 09:27
- Forum: Z-Uno
- Topic: Create CommandClasses with "older" versions?
- Replies: 15
- Views: 14726
Re: Create CommandClasses with "older" versions?
Hi, thank your for this information, such details are NOT included in the normal documentation as released now by Sigma. I looked briefly at the ALARM / NOTIFICATION command class description and could not find these information there, so you have definitely more information available. For the imple...
- 07 Sep 2016 13:03
- Forum: Z-Uno
- Topic: Create CommandClasses with "older" versions?
- Replies: 15
- Views: 14726
Re: Create CommandClasses with "older" versions?
Hi, Notification is already in (Sensor binary channel is implementing both Sensor Binary and Notification). ok, I did see that, good to know. For some CCs it is forbidden to use too old versions. Z-Uno always uses the latest and best ;) Is there a document showing which versions are not be used for ...
- 07 Sep 2016 07:46
- Forum: Z-Uno
- Topic: Create CommandClasses with "older" versions?
- Replies: 15
- Views: 14726
Re: Create CommandClasses with "older" versions?
Hi, thank you for the explanation. That is more or less what I expected. But I do not understand why it would be against "certification rules" to implement an older version of a command class. As far as I know, the "rule" is that ALL commands of a command class have to be impleme...