Device is flooding z-wave network with messages

Discussions about Z-Way software and Z-Wave technology in general
Post Reply
sputniki
Posts: 18
Joined: 24 Oct 2018 12:06

Device is flooding z-wave network with messages

Post by sputniki »

I have one device (Steinel STEEIS1402SW) that is bombing my z-wave network with messages and makes the z-way-server inaccessable.
There are millions of these messages in the log:

[2019-06-19 06:06:49.905] [D] [zway] SETDATA devices.10.data.lastReceived = 0 (0x00000000)
[2019-06-19 06:06:49.905] [D] [zway] SETDATA devices.10.instances.0.commandClasses.90.data.reset = True
[2019-06-19 06:06:49.909] [core] Notification: error (connection): User reset to factory defaults Z-Wave device ID: 10
[2019-06-19 06:06:49.927] [core] Notification: error (connection): User reset to factory defaults Z-Wave device ID: 10
[2019-06-19 06:06:49.946] [core] Notification: error (connection): User reset to factory defaults Z-Wave device ID: 10
[2019-06-19 06:06:49.972] [core] Notification: error (connection): User reset to factory defaults Z-Wave device ID: 10
[2019-06-19 06:06:49.992] [core] Notification: error (connection): User reset to factory defaults Z-Wave device ID: 10
[2019-06-19 06:06:50.011] [core] Notification: error (connection): User reset to factory defaults Z-Wave device ID: 10
[2019-06-19 06:06:50.015] [D] [zway] RECEIVED: ( 01 19 00 49 84 0A 13 04 07 01 5E 7A 86 72 60 5A 70 73 77 71 85 8E 59 31 25 27 BE )
[2019-06-19 06:06:50.016] [D] [zway] SENT ACK
User avatar
PoltoS
Posts: 7565
Joined: 26 Jan 2011 19:36

Re: Device is flooding z-wave network with messages

Post by PoltoS »

Looks like device bug. Try to reset it, exclude and then include again
sputniki
Posts: 18
Joined: 24 Oct 2018 12:06

Re: Device is flooding z-wave network with messages

Post by sputniki »

This is similar to the other two devices from same vendor. Did firmware upgrade last year (provided by the vendor) but sometimes the PIR sensors do this.
Is it possible, that my Razberry module is faulty? In the last three weeks there were "strange actions": the roller shutters are set to 100% and the same time two other devices are activated.
The avoid misunderstandings: This happens within the Z-wave network without any association between the devices and without activated rules in the controller software. I changed the controller software from Z-Way-Server to Openhab2 two days ago and yesterday it happened again (at 22:27:xx):

Code: Select all

2019-06-25 22:23:58.562 [vent.ItemStateChangedEvent] - SmartSwitch013_ElectricMeterVolts changed from 233.374 to 233.652
2019-06-25 22:24:07.962 [me.event.ThingUpdatedEvent] - Thing 'yamahareceiver:zone:9ab0c000_f668_11de_9976_ac44f242aa8c:Zone_2' has been updated.
2019-06-25 22:27:09.624 [vent.ItemStateChangedEvent] - JalousieHanni029_SensorPower changed from 0 to 97.5
2019-06-25 22:27:09.777 [vent.ItemStateChangedEvent] - JalousieWZOst024_SensorPower changed from 0 to 97.7
2019-06-25 22:27:11.167 [vent.ItemStateChangedEvent] - SmartSwitch014_Switch changed from NULL to ON
2019-06-25 22:27:21.402 [vent.ItemStateChangedEvent] - JalousieHanni029_SensorPower changed from 97.5 to 0
2019-06-25 22:27:22.879 [vent.ItemStateChangedEvent] - JalousieHanni029_SensorPower changed from 0 to 97.9
2019-06-25 22:27:33.057 [vent.ItemStateChangedEvent] - JalousieWZOst024_SensorPower changed from 97.7 to 0
2019-06-25 22:27:34.466 [vent.ItemStateChangedEvent] - JalousieWZOst024_BlindsControl changed from NULL to 100
2019-06-25 22:27:37.118 [vent.ItemStateChangedEvent] - JalousieHanni029_SensorPower changed from 97.9 to 39.5
2019-06-25 22:27:38.886 [vent.ItemStateChangedEvent] - JalousieHanni029_BlindsControl changed from NULL to 0
2019-06-25 22:27:38.945 [vent.ItemStateChangedEvent] - JalousieHanni029_SensorPower changed from 39.5 to 0
2019-06-25 22:28:08.144 [me.event.ThingUpdatedEvent] - Thing 'yamahareceiver:zone:9ab0c000_f668_11de_9976_ac44f242aa8c:Main_Zone' has been updated.
2019-06-25 22:28:13.555 [vent.ItemStateChangedEvent] - SmartSwitch013_ElectricMeterVolts changed from 233.652 to 233.669
Post Reply