Hi,
I would like to know if someone try to use Fibaro RGB module with Razberry ? Is that work ? Maybe supported soon ?
Thank for your answer
Razberry and Fibaro RGB
Works perfectly (shows up as
Works perfectly (shows up as 4 dimmers)
Re: Razberry and Fibaro RGB
I'm seeing strange behaviour for the fibaro RGBW controller.
2 of the many interview results continue to fail... regardless of my attemps...
SwitchColor and PowerLevel
2 of the many interview results continue to fail... regardless of my attemps...
SwitchColor and PowerLevel
Using BMSLink https://linode.bmslink.co.uk with z-way-server. http://linode.bmslink.co.uk:4567
Re: Razberry and Fibaro RGB
Mine does the same, I assumed that this was work in progress for new features.
I'm intrigued by the SwitchColor class though, the only results on Google seem to all point back to Z-Wave.me. The command class ID 0x33 is already in use for the Advanced Z/IP Server class. This class is indeed supported by one (555) of the two (491+555) FRGBW records in the Pepper1 database. It's the only device in the entire database that seems to support any of the Z/IP command classes though... so that doesn't seem quite right.
I'm intrigued by the SwitchColor class though, the only results on Google seem to all point back to Z-Wave.me. The command class ID 0x33 is already in use for the Advanced Z/IP Server class. This class is indeed supported by one (555) of the two (491+555) FRGBW records in the Pepper1 database. It's the only device in the entire database that seems to support any of the Z/IP command classes though... so that doesn't seem quite right.
Re: Razberry and Fibaro RGB
The original name for SwitchColor is actually Color Control, we just named it to resemble other similar command classes.
This is actually wrong. The closest Z/IP-related command class is 0x23, all the others Z/IP classes are above 0x4F.Eric wrote:The command class ID 0x33 is already in use for the Advanced Z/IP Server class
Re: Razberry and Fibaro RGB
Actually, SwitchColor shouldn't pass interview for Fibaro RGBW controller, because there's a bug in device itself.
If I recall, it always reports the same capability regardless which one was requested.
The bug was reported to Fibaro, and they're fixing it.
Not sure why PowerLevel fails. Probably the device doesn't report back on POWER_LEVEL_GET requested. Need to see the log to say for sure.
If I recall, it always reports the same capability regardless which one was requested.
The bug was reported to Fibaro, and they're fixing it.
Not sure why PowerLevel fails. Probably the device doesn't report back on POWER_LEVEL_GET requested. Need to see the log to say for sure.